My Lord! Open up for me my heart. And ease for me my task. And untie the knot of my tongue.
That they may understand my speech.

Qur'an - 20:25-28

Showing posts with label creative writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label creative writing. Show all posts

Saturday, August 31, 2013

The 'Strong' Female Lead

I read this post a few days ago, and I'm just very happy about it :) Why? It's kind of like a 'my-thoughts-exactly' situation, only Derek Landy (and I guess, his 'Twitter-wife'...?) just added to it, you know, developed the idea to more sophisticated proportions that my brain couldn't do, on its own.

[INTERMISSION: Have you people read the Skulduggery Pleasant books? If you haven't, DO READ THEM. They are hilarious. So completely laugh-out-loudable. And yeah, the storylines are exciting, captivating (though admittedly, when he gets to specific fighting scenes, he loses me), and the characters, whether they're evil or not, you love 'em all. But for me, personally, they're just so funny and that's the main reason why you should read them :) ]

So anyhow.

Over the last year or so, I've noticed this certain pattern in some kinds of YA novels, the dystopian or fantasy or adventure-y type. Mind you, not all of them are like I'm going to describe, but still enough for me to make out this pattern.

Basically, there will be a leading female character. She will be a kick-butt, in-yo-face ninja type. Or she will try to be this type, for the purpose of her story. Completely tomboy. And then, added to that, she has this certain kind of 'angry' attitude - you know, she repels people, she finds it difficult to accept love, maybe she's socially awkward, she's just better at hitting people, blah blah blah. And sometimes, if you get really lucky, she's also contemptuous of all things girly, or the homebody type of female.

And I'd read this books, write up a review or whatever, and check out other people's opinions (other reviews, or just you know, ask friends who've read them), and the general view is kind of like "gutsy female lead, strong, resilient"... that kind of thing, you know?

And it really irked me. Firstly, it just annoyed me that this was the type that got all the praise. What, so now girls have to be angry and masculine in order to be deemed 'respectable' female characters? I mean, to me, those characters were highly unlikeable personally, but now they were the role models for what the perfect female character was supposed to be.

Let me just say, I am not a 'girly girl'. I think I'm developing some 'girly girl' tendencies, 'cause, well, I'm a little more conscious about what I wear, and yesh, I do like pretty clothes, though perhaps not to the extreme of my sister, or feeling that desire to fit into the trends, or.... you know, I sound really defensive. And I'm digressing. 

But what I'm trying to say is, while I'm not into makeup and shoes and giggly-gossiping and shopping and checking out guys all the time, I don't begrudge that for other girls. Well, maybe the gossiping - sometimes I try to divert the topic and if it gets serious, I do start telling them off. BUT, generally speaking, if that's what they like, why should I be holding them in contempt? They're not hurting anyone. Except with the gossiping, maybe...

ANYWAY. The point is, the point is, when these female leads that I'm talking about start dissing the 'airheads' that are fashionable or lovestruck, I just get really annoyed. No, I mean, I wouldn't, if not for the fact that I've noticed it in multiple books this year and the last. If it was just one here or there, whatever, you know? But this is a pattern. A trend. An unhealthy one. That's mostly being applauded.

So yeah, I started getting really annoyed at this developing stereotype. And then I read that post by Derek Landy, and his Twitter-wife's article (although, admittedly, some of it was lost on me, because I'm not really familiar with all the superhero movie references she makes o.o), and I was just so pleased because they highlighted this issue, in their wise way, and did it without the raging and ranting that I would have done it with, and yeah. 

One of the messages is basically:

REMOVE THE LABELS. Let female characters be female characters. 

I mean, take Bella Swan. I remember, when I was in 'Camp Anti-Twilight', this girl on SW was doing a series of rants about different aspects of Twilight. And she was doing character focused ones, and when she got to Bella... well, you can imagine how much she had to say. Everyone has a lot to say. The common criticism is that she's weak (and angsty and annoying and co-dependant and pathetic and blahdiblahblah). This girl, doing her rants, was all like 'Bella is such a disgrace, while she so readily helps around the house and blah blah, you will never find her doing something that's not all wifey/motherly, you know, like painting a fence or something....".

And, even being in Camp Anti-Twilight, I still didn't really like that argument. Yes, Bella was angsty and all that jazz, but why the need to mention she doesn't do what she calls 'guy work'? So what? My older sister doesn't do guy work. She hates working outside the house. She hates getting her hands dirty. Big deal. I don't think that makes her a disgrace to womankind. And I don't think it's a crime to be weak, either. Boys and girls both can be weak, and in the name of making 'realistic' characters, why would it be such a bad thing to have a protagonist that was 'weak' in that way? 

""Strength" is one dimensional. It's saying "women can be strong like men", NOT "women are flawed, complex, brilliant, weak LIKE MEN."

(That being said, I'm still not a fan of Twilight, but to each his/her own *shrug*)

Also, that 'stereotype' that I mentioned was developing? I'm not really against it, in the sense that like Bella-Swan types of girls, there are obviously the angry-antisocial-tomboy types of girls too. I just want to remove this notion that they are the epitome of what the perfect female character - or female - should be. 

Really, read the blog post + the article. Much more worth reading than this post, for that matter x) 

Thoughts?

Okay, just some other things...

THE BOOK THIEF TRAILER CAME OUT!!! ZOMG. ZOMG. Okay. It's awesome. 
And you know, if you were thinking of Death, according to the amazing Markus Zusak: 

"…and I will just say to all the loyal readers out there who might be wondering if Death narrates the actual film, as he does in the book:
The answer is an emphatic
YES.
...
Just as he does in the book, Death will help look after us.
And he’ll do his very best."

 

Ummm... yeah. I have my first exam (French oral) on the 23rd of October o_o Scared. I donno. Everything's so close. Talking about the Valedictory dinner and the Farewell Assembly, getting the dates for final SACs, applying for universities, getting 'life talks'... it's just overwhelming. Trying not to think about it, but it just keeps coming back :/


Peace in,
Laila

Sunday, March 31, 2013

Aliens and ghosts, and a prince with a golden palace

This is a tale about sheer stupidity. Okay, maybe that's harsh. This is a tale about someone who truly cannot appreciate - no, understand or comprehend creativity. It left me sort of speechless, in a gobsmacked kind of way. Kind of like this:

See? She doesn't look too happy, huh? Flabbergasted.
But this speechlessness tends to follow after the many, many ... minutes ... of arguing and talking in circles, which I will now explain.

(Agh, the 'minutes' totally took the drama out of it, didn't it? *sigh* )

You see, I have a bone to pick, with my French teacher. In fact, I've actually already picked this bone with him, a million times over, and still I cannot decrease the annoyance I have for him. First, just before I begin, I feel like I need to tell you that when I first started high school, in my first French class, he told us he was a prince.


...

...

I mean, seriously. Yes, you  read the title. He even claims he has a golden palace. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt, to some extent, but in the sense that I'll-believe-it-when-I-see-it. But you just don't tell high schoolers this in general, not unless you can definitely prove it, because they will take the mickey out of you, big time. For a guy who's been teaching for ages, you'd think he'd know that. And come on, our school is considered to be in the slums - what prince would teach here? But no, he says he's still awaiting the day of his grand return. No joke.


And because it's been what, six years? and not one shred of evidence has turned up, I just... can't... take... him... seriously. That is why, when you read about our 'debates', you'll notice that I can talk to him in a sort'veaggressive, straightforward manner, whereas usually I'd just be awkward and submissive and die.


So basically, it started with a story. For all the LOTE exams, you see, one of the requirements is to produce a written piece, in whatever language. They give you a range of prompts to choose from, and these can vary from informal/formal letters to articles to journal entries. And short stories. Usually, the teacher encourages us to stick to letters, because it's relatively easy and you get a lot of marks just for mastering the structure. But our teacher, this year, decided that we ought to practise some other styles, just in case the prompt for a letter doesn't show up. He had all the prompts from the previous years, and he told us to pick one of the story ones and write it up as practise.

Here's my prompt, word for word, quoted off VCAA:

2003 French Exam:
Question 30
You have decided to enter a story writing competition run by a daily newspaper. You are to write an imaginative story entitled ‘Lost in a big city’.

Is that absolutely clear? Okay. Right. Lettuce continue.

So my teacher tells us to write around about 250 - 300 words. Note that's hardly enough for a complex story, and note that we're learning French second hand, and we've had a history of dreadful teachers, so complexity in this foreign language may just be a little bit hard to master. 

My story was mainly descriptive, but the essence was that there was a little girl, she was lost in the city (ta daaaa!), she was scared, she was awaiting her parents but no one showed, and at the end, the next morning, she's dead. The end.

It's not supposed to win an award or anything, okay? So anyway, it was like, even before he started reading, he'd made his decision that he wanted to hate it. 

Il pleut à torrents, the story starts. "Why is it raining?" he asks sceptically..

"Umm... why can't it be raining?" I counter.

"You are right," he nods. "Let's continue." I'm sort of like:
 So we continue. He makes some general corrections, and then we get to the part where I 'introduce' the character, like this: Elle s'assoit sur le bord.

"Who's this?" my teacher asks.

"It's the character," I say. "Keep reading." He looks doubtful, but he does so anyway. He gets to the end, and then he sort of sighs, and places his hands on the table.

"I'm sorry," he says. "I just don't feel it."

I'm like, "Sorry?"

"You just didn't answer the question," he explains. I raise my eyebrows.

"There's no question, sir," I reply.  "It just says write a story entitled 'Lost in a big city.'"

"Yeah, but you must answer the question," he says. "You must say who is lost in the city, why they are lost in the city, how they came to be lost in the city, and how they get out of the city."

"No, they don't ask for that," I say firmly. "It says write a story entitled 'Lost in a big city'. How I choose to interpret that title is my choice."

"Yes, but a story needs to have a problem-"

"Mine does."

"- and it needs to have characters-"

"I do have a character."

"Where?" he asks. I point to the part where my little girl is.

"You are right." Pause. "But you say she is wet and cold but she is not lost."

"Yes she is," I say, then point out the line where it says 'Solitaire dans le monde, perdue dans une grande ville.' He looks at it, nods, and sighs.

"You are right," he says. He pauses, and sighs again. "But I don't feel it."
In fact, I ought to add that this expression turned up a million times during this conversation.
"What don't you feel, sir?" And I'm clearly exasperated at this point. There are no niceties.

"You didn't answer the question," he says.

"There is no question!" I all but snap, gritting my teeth. And then we're talking in a circle, again, as he goes over all the nonexistent questions I didn't answer and all the things he didn't feel, and we come to another impasse. I try for some perspective.

"Look," I say, as patiently as I possibly can. "I think I know what you want. You want the standard story formula, with the beginning-middle/conflict-end layout, right? And you want everything to be clear as crystal, with no questions left at the end. This is just a different style."

"I know what you are trying to do, Laila," trying for his some perspective himself. "You want to create some tension, some suspense, but I just don't feel it." (Teeth grinding) "You see how she dies at the end? It's like you just want to shut it there. So there's no questions."

"Okay, look, whether or not there are questions or whatever, the point is, it's my story," I say. "I have a creative licence and I'm entitled to use it. I'm writing for this imaginary contest, and however I respond to the prompt is my choice, and they put very few limits on it, so I took advantage of that. Your problem is that it doesn't suit your taste. But sir, if you liked a good romance and I didn't write one, is that my problem? The examiners are going to grade this based on spelling and grammar and structure, as well as relevance. Their feelings don't come into it. I'm not obliged to cater to anyone's tastes. So basically, whether or not you 'feel' it is irrelevant."

**I'm taking a moment to stress that I don't always talk to my teachers like this. In fact, I never do. It's just this one guy gets on my nerves, and also - and I do respect him for this - he allows me to speak to him so. If he ever said LAILA YOU'RE BEING RUDE SHUT UP DETENTION!, trust me, I'd never go this far.**

So after that, he basically said he still doesn't feel it, but I am right, and that is the end of that. NOT. That's the end of my little episode with him, and I learnt from there that I ought not to be adventurous. We had another practise after this one, and the whole class was to write on the same prompt. That is:


Write a short imaginative story for the newspaper France Soir about what happened during the night of a power failure.

I wrote my story in a relatively boring fashion (which earned his full approval), but this other guy decided to make a ghost story out of it. My French teacher's response was: "That's bull****."
At first, I decided to stay quiet. I push his buttons a lot, you see, on a range of other topics, (agh, he's just so freaking arrogant I want to slap him with the Punishment Salmon), so I thought I'd best keep my nose out of this one. But he was just such a meanie bo to this guy, and he decided to bring up the perpetual stupidity of this story the next day as well, and then, I just couldn't stand it.

So I'm like, "Sir, what's wrong with a ghost story?"

"It's not realistic, and it's not relevant," he said. "Ghosts don't come for power shortages."

"But it's an imaginative story, so they could," I said. 

"No, they can't," he said abruptly. "It's bull****. Ghosts aren't real."

"According to you," I said. "Some people do believe in them, and it's not for you to make the final decision. Besides, that's not the point. The point is it's an imaginative story, and he can write what he wants, even if it includes ghosts."

"But it's not relevant," he said. 

"He can make it relevant," I replied. Then he smiled in that 'look at you, you poor confused girl' way.

"You just want to say everyone can write about anything," he said.

"Well, not exactly, but I guess that's true," I said. "It said to write about the night of a power shortage. Literally anything could happen, they didn't put restrictions on it." So my French teacher decided to try another tactic, which kind of contradicted his point about ghosts not existing, now that I think about it.

"But ghosts don't come when there are power shortages," he said. "They're in haunted houses and scary stories like that."

"Well, in thisguy's story, maybe they do show up in the power shortage," I said. "Or maybe they caused it. It's a story. If thisguy wants to make the ghost show up around a power shortage, then he can. They never said you couldn't."

"But he's in year 12," he protested. "He shouldn't be writing stupid ghost stories in year 12. That's for children."

And I'm like, "You realise there are fully grown adults who have written ghost stories and have them published. You know that, right?"

So more talking in circles occurred, me getting increasingly frustrated by his annoyingly narrow mind when it comes to the possibilities that stories can open up. Then he decided that he would go around the class, asking each and everyone what they had written, just to highlight how foolishly outlandish thisguy's idea was. At that moment, I wished I had written about pirates or something - and in fact, that's what my French teacher assumed I had done. He couldn't understand why else I'd be so defensive if I hadn't written a ridiculous story myself. I proved him wrong, in that sense, as my story was incredibly dull, but in wanting another crazy story in my class, I wasn't let down.

A year 11 boy, who was doing year 12 French because it's his mother tongue, said he was writing a story about the end of the world. In my head, I was like yessssss, take that, sir. You love this kid, whatchu gonna say to that one, huh? HUH?!

"See?" my French teacher said enthusiastically. "See what a good idea that is? Why couldn't you do something like that?"
Are you noticing a theme with these gifs?
"So," I said. "Let me get this straight. Thatguy is allowed to write about the end of the [FREAKING] world, and thisguy can't write about ghosts?"

"Yeah, why not?" the prince of the freaking golden palace said. "If the end of the world comes, the power will go out, no?"

Mind you, this is for the newspaper, presumably for the next day, or the day after. Pretty sure if it's the end of the world, no one will be writing stories about it. Because, you know, the world would have ended. I didn't say that to him at the time, because I was too busy looking like Selena Gomez in that gif above (expression wise, just in case you needed that cleared up ^_^ Let's not get started on looks).

Okay, now, my mind is a little blank here, as to how the next point came up exactly, but basically, thisguy was saying something that came to the lines of: "So if I decided to write a story about aliens invading Earth-"

"That's an excellent idea!" my French teacher beamed. "Yes, see, you should write that story. That's a good idea."


"Hold up," I said, after gawking for a moment. And in fact, the whole class was gawking. "Did you just say it's okay to write a story about aliens but not ghosts?...Um... what?"

"Yeah," my French teacher said, in a kind of duh manner. "If aliens come and invade the Earth, what do you think they will do first? They'll cut the power, right? It makes sense."
Yeah, okay, I can't even go on. He was dead serious, to the point that the next day, he brought in a criteria and made us look explicitly at the 'relevance' section, before lecturing us that ghosts aren't relevant, but somehow aliens are. Mind you, later criticism on my SAC story was that I had the structure of the story all wrong because you're supposed to have a introduction, body, and conclusion paragraph. I tried to say that it wasn't an essay, but he didn't believe me. He also took a mark off because apparently you're not allowed to have little individual lines, the kind of standalone sentence one puts to dramatise a specific point. I tried explaining that I had been doing this for years in school, and no teacher has ever told me off for it, but then he made a snarky comment that perhaps I ought to have a 'chat' with my teachers, adding some implication that perhaps they were teaching us all wrong.


Truthfully, I know I must sound angry, but I'm not really. I just... it's like... well, I can't believe he can be so absolutely thick. And then, I just feel sorry for him, because sadly, here is a person who will never appreciate the beauty of creative writing.


There are times I remind myself of 'the children in Africa', when I'm being ungrateful about say, food or something. Other times, I remind myself of those who don't have limbs or something, when I'm not appreciating my health, or I'm being too focused on the superficial aspects of my appearance, or my lack of skill in an area.

And now, ladies and gentlemen, I think of the prince [in exile?] and his golden palace, who teaches at my school, and cannot fathom imagination, and doesn't seem to have a shred of logic either, for that matter, to remind myself that I'm really blessed.

Peace in,
Laila